Comments on: D&D Adventurers League – Top 20 Adventures

By: Marty Walser

Marty Walser — Wed, 31 May 2017 19:56:00 +0000

In reply to Mike Long. DMGuild should open the rating system with a "Verified" tag next to reviewers who have purchased. Technically, non-purchasing players could leave a review in the comments, but it would probably help the community if DM Guild was a little more pro-active about reviews.

By: Mike Long

Mike Long — Wed, 12 Apr 2017 20:34:00 +0000

In reply to ramak. The publisher (DnDAL) would have to send out the coupon codes to Reviewers. I don't know if DnDAL does that as a regular practice.

By: Mike Long

Mike Long — Wed, 12 Apr 2017 20:33:00 +0000

In reply to MTi. There are level ranges for each adventure with a set level that the adventure was written for. Along with that, they have instructions for going up and down the level range. Beyond that, you'd have to make adjustments yourself.

By: ramak

ramak — Tue, 11 Apr 2017 19:55:00 +0000

Sadly, most people that have ran or played these adventures (mostly on stores) can’t rate them, as its closed to those that purchased them there (including the ones that are available for free on Dragon+). Some good ones don’t even have reviews there. I think I would just open the rating system, so that more people can talk about these modules, and therefore more people are drawn to them. At the very least I would send special codes to people like Merric that coordinate the league and have reviewing blogs.

I’ve scourged many many forums of people discussing AL modules, and some consistently praised ones are Dues for the dead (s1), Tales trees tell (s1) and Cloak and Dagger (s2). The intro for each season are also well regarded for introducing newer players.

By: MTi

MTi — Tue, 11 Apr 2017 07:05:00 +0000

Thanks for that Michael! I love the way the mini adventures for DDAL are made and I’m planning to invest on a couple or more on these to have for one-shots.

Is it possible to also add the level for which they are intended?

Thanks again!!!