Huh. I totally didn’t know that. For the most part, I try and lift wording directly from abilities with similar conditionals. I will see what I can do to straighten the wording of that out. I really appreciate you pointing it out.

As far as Living Sign goes, I’ve talked it out enough now that I think it’s fine with the extra d10, which increases the efficacy to “strong,” in my opinion at any rate.

Slight issue: Signs and Portents seems like it might not do a ton when used against an enemy. Reaction on initiative means it happens before any actual turns occur, but it’s worded as “until the start of their next turn”. I assume this is supposed to be more like just a “save against this at start of turn until it’s gone”, just odd language (unless that’s how such effects are usually written). I’m also concerned that the Level 14 ability isn’t strong enough.

It is not the intent, no. I think I parsed that cleanly enough in the RAW, but I am always open to cleaning up wording if needed.

Since it doesn’t double on a crit, it makes it a lot less spiky than a lot of things. That’s more or less what I was balancing around.

Though my exaggerated example brings up another point; if the attack crits, does the druid’s damage dice double with it? I wouldn’t think so, but it never hurts to ask intent!

I have this great mental image of players getting sucked through stellar gateways onto strange worlds outside of time and space and the Zodiac druid being their survival guide. And summoning strange alien wildlife — who’s a cute little Hound of Tindalos? You are! You are!

I had a hard time deciding on 3d10 or 4d10, myself. Ultimately, I went with 3d10 as I thought erring on the side of conservative would be okay. Obviously, the conceit of the setting as I have discussed it would trigger both narrow operands quite a bit. However, that doesn’t mean it would in other places. In short, it might be a tad weak or it might be spot on.

Living Sign’s “3rd-level moonbeam + narrow saving throw benefits” is an interesting choice. I go back and forth on whether I think it should be +1d10 stronger, so I’m curious about your thoughts on its benchmarking.

Great work here, as always.