<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Pathfinder 2nd Edition Playtest Announced	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/</link>
	<description>D&#38;D / Role Playing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 19:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: TapWatr		</title>
		<link>https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/#comment-5001</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TapWatr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.tribality.com/?p=23353#comment-5001</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I really wanna get the deluxe hardcover, but afraid from the playtest to release there&#039;s going to be some big changes and make the book immediately obsolete. D:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really wanna get the deluxe hardcover, but afraid from the playtest to release there&#8217;s going to be some big changes and make the book immediately obsolete. D:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Manos Ti		</title>
		<link>https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/#comment-4974</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manos Ti]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 10:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.tribality.com/?p=23353#comment-4974</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/#comment-4969&quot;&gt;tribality&lt;/a&gt;.

Generally, the initial success of PF was mainly due to the popularity of D&#038;D 3.5e; people liked the evolution of that rules system and kept on going with that. Paizo also maintained that hype with a multitude of products. This also affected Starfinder, that is (as far as I have came to understand) Sci Fi PF and there is no current comparable product from WotC. 

But my real question is this: knowing how WotC has steered from 3.5e onwards, what would anyone that has enjoyed PF 1e like to see from 2e? I&#039;m totally on board with you that likely Paizo will not base PF 2e on any D&#038;D edition, so I&#039;d really like to see the direction they are taking.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/#comment-4969">tribality</a>.</p>
<p>Generally, the initial success of PF was mainly due to the popularity of D&amp;D 3.5e; people liked the evolution of that rules system and kept on going with that. Paizo also maintained that hype with a multitude of products. This also affected Starfinder, that is (as far as I have came to understand) Sci Fi PF and there is no current comparable product from WotC. </p>
<p>But my real question is this: knowing how WotC has steered from 3.5e onwards, what would anyone that has enjoyed PF 1e like to see from 2e? I&#8217;m totally on board with you that likely Paizo will not base PF 2e on any D&amp;D edition, so I&#8217;d really like to see the direction they are taking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ish		</title>
		<link>https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/#comment-4973</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.tribality.com/?p=23353#comment-4973</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/#comment-4963&quot;&gt;Freds&lt;/a&gt;.

I personally stopped ‘Pathfinder’ about two years after it launched because of the splatbook glut. I know many other people who eventually stopped playing it at some point or another for the same reason.

I know the plural of “anecdote” is not “data,” but it’s been a common enough complaint for me to suspect it’s a trend.

My theory is that the market has kind of split: that X% of people who love loads and loads of supplements are playing ‘Pathfinder,’ the X% that want things streamlined into very few books are playing 5E, and then there’s the X% that is happy just to play and goes with whatever the rest their group prefers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/#comment-4963">Freds</a>.</p>
<p>I personally stopped ‘Pathfinder’ about two years after it launched because of the splatbook glut. I know many other people who eventually stopped playing it at some point or another for the same reason.</p>
<p>I know the plural of “anecdote” is not “data,” but it’s been a common enough complaint for me to suspect it’s a trend.</p>
<p>My theory is that the market has kind of split: that X% of people who love loads and loads of supplements are playing ‘Pathfinder,’ the X% that want things streamlined into very few books are playing 5E, and then there’s the X% that is happy just to play and goes with whatever the rest their group prefers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Freds		</title>
		<link>https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/#comment-4971</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Freds]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 19:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.tribality.com/?p=23353#comment-4971</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/#comment-4968&quot;&gt;tribality&lt;/a&gt;.

5e&#039;s official publishing schedule is quite reasonable. The old adage, &quot;Always leave &#039;em wanting more,&quot; comes to mind.

But I was specifically comparing PF to 3e. At its &quot;worst,&quot; WOTC was churning out a book a month during that era. Paizo churns out multiple books per month. Sure, many of them are softcovers, but a player who wants to stay current (read: not get steamrolled by the newest &lt;s&gt;railroad&lt;/s&gt; adventure path) needs them all. I just can&#039;t wrap my head around why people seem to be okay with a full decade of this (and PF2 will undoubtedly continue the process, selling you updates of the books you already have), but d20 was in a &quot;glut&quot; after just a year or two according to those same people.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/#comment-4968">tribality</a>.</p>
<p>5e&#8217;s official publishing schedule is quite reasonable. The old adage, &#8220;Always leave &#8217;em wanting more,&#8221; comes to mind.</p>
<p>But I was specifically comparing PF to 3e. At its &#8220;worst,&#8221; WOTC was churning out a book a month during that era. Paizo churns out multiple books per month. Sure, many of them are softcovers, but a player who wants to stay current (read: not get steamrolled by the newest <s>railroad</s> adventure path) needs them all. I just can&#8217;t wrap my head around why people seem to be okay with a full decade of this (and PF2 will undoubtedly continue the process, selling you updates of the books you already have), but d20 was in a &#8220;glut&#8221; after just a year or two according to those same people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brandes Stoddard		</title>
		<link>https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/#comment-4972</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandes Stoddard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 19:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.tribality.com/?p=23353#comment-4972</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/#comment-4969&quot;&gt;tribality&lt;/a&gt;.

The absence of all-but-one background, all-but-one feat, all-but-one subclass per class, and so on means that you&#039;re having to &lt;em&gt;leave out&lt;/em&gt; a whole lot of fan-favorite content, and write a lot more of the game from scratch, with 5e than with 3.5e. It&#039;s a significant hurdle, created for exactly this purpose.

All of which is to say, I agree with you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/#comment-4969">tribality</a>.</p>
<p>The absence of all-but-one background, all-but-one feat, all-but-one subclass per class, and so on means that you&#8217;re having to <em>leave out</em> a whole lot of fan-favorite content, and write a lot more of the game from scratch, with 5e than with 3.5e. It&#8217;s a significant hurdle, created for exactly this purpose.</p>
<p>All of which is to say, I agree with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: tribality		</title>
		<link>https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/#comment-4970</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tribality]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.tribality.com/?p=23353#comment-4970</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/#comment-4962&quot;&gt;Ish&lt;/a&gt;.

I hear ya. I&#039;d personally rather just grab PDF versions so I can easily get updates during the playtest, like the UA content.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/#comment-4962">Ish</a>.</p>
<p>I hear ya. I&#8217;d personally rather just grab PDF versions so I can easily get updates during the playtest, like the UA content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: tribality		</title>
		<link>https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/#comment-4969</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tribality]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.tribality.com/?p=23353#comment-4969</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/#comment-4964&quot;&gt;Manos Ti&lt;/a&gt;.

4e couldn&#039;t be used as the bones for a system like 3.5 was with license changes. I don&#039;t think there is anything legal that could stop Pathfinder from slapping a version 2.0 game on top of D&#038;D 5e basic rules... but I can&#039;t see that happening.

With the growth of 5e, pathfinder&#039;s Golarion becoming a 5e setting and having adventures that can be run in 5e could lead to big sales, but would kill their rules system. I think they can do quite well on their own and Starfinder sales were very good.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/#comment-4964">Manos Ti</a>.</p>
<p>4e couldn&#8217;t be used as the bones for a system like 3.5 was with license changes. I don&#8217;t think there is anything legal that could stop Pathfinder from slapping a version 2.0 game on top of D&amp;D 5e basic rules&#8230; but I can&#8217;t see that happening.</p>
<p>With the growth of 5e, pathfinder&#8217;s Golarion becoming a 5e setting and having adventures that can be run in 5e could lead to big sales, but would kill their rules system. I think they can do quite well on their own and Starfinder sales were very good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: tribality		</title>
		<link>https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/#comment-4968</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tribality]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 17:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.tribality.com/?p=23353#comment-4968</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/#comment-4963&quot;&gt;Freds&lt;/a&gt;.

I think 5e has a pecking order that works. 
1) Official
2) Really good third party stuff like Tome of Beasts
3) OK Third party and DMs Guild.

With so few products released for #1, it is possible to purchase each hardcover book or at least have a good idea of everything official that is out there (I think the count is 14 now). 

I&#039;ve got a pretty good grasp on all of the official pathfinder books out there, but much harder and more $$$ to own it all. I&#039;d have no idea how many 3rd party products exist.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/#comment-4963">Freds</a>.</p>
<p>I think 5e has a pecking order that works.<br />
1) Official<br />
2) Really good third party stuff like Tome of Beasts<br />
3) OK Third party and DMs Guild.</p>
<p>With so few products released for #1, it is possible to purchase each hardcover book or at least have a good idea of everything official that is out there (I think the count is 14 now). </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got a pretty good grasp on all of the official pathfinder books out there, but much harder and more $$$ to own it all. I&#8217;d have no idea how many 3rd party products exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Manos Ti		</title>
		<link>https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/#comment-4964</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manos Ti]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 07:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.tribality.com/?p=23353#comment-4964</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/#comment-4957&quot;&gt;tribality&lt;/a&gt;.

Well, the real question is: how ORIGINAL will PF 2e be? Knowing that PF 1e was an evolution of D&#038;D 3.5e, and since then D&#038;D has had two new editions (the last one the most successful -in terms of sales- so far), let alone the fact that there are numerous rules systems out there, I&#039;m really interested to find out what new PF 2e will offer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/#comment-4957">tribality</a>.</p>
<p>Well, the real question is: how ORIGINAL will PF 2e be? Knowing that PF 1e was an evolution of D&amp;D 3.5e, and since then D&amp;D has had two new editions (the last one the most successful -in terms of sales- so far), let alone the fact that there are numerous rules systems out there, I&#8217;m really interested to find out what new PF 2e will offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Freds		</title>
		<link>https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/#comment-4963</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Freds]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 22:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.tribality.com/?p=23353#comment-4963</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/#comment-4955&quot;&gt;Marsupialmancer&lt;/a&gt;.

What I can&#039;t comprehend is: back when 3e came out and everybody started publishing stuff for it, in no time at all people were calling it &quot;the d20 glut.&quot; Yet Paizo—by itself—churns out garbage faster than WOTC &lt;i&gt;plus&lt;/i&gt; all the third-party publishers ever dreamed of, and has been doing so for 10 years now, and people are still eating it up.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.tribality.com/2018/03/06/pathfinder-2nd-edition-playtest-announced/#comment-4955">Marsupialmancer</a>.</p>
<p>What I can&#8217;t comprehend is: back when 3e came out and everybody started publishing stuff for it, in no time at all people were calling it &#8220;the d20 glut.&#8221; Yet Paizo—by itself—churns out garbage faster than WOTC <i>plus</i> all the third-party publishers ever dreamed of, and has been doing so for 10 years now, and people are still eating it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
